In the News
- Angry WH / GOP senators clash over letter to Iran
- Iran’s scornful reax
- Poll: Early takeaways for 2016
- Clinton likely to speak on emails this week
- Immigration: Tx judge leaves block in place
- University of Oklahoma fraternity: Racist videos
- Ferguson: Judge replaced
- UN: Violence against women
- Putin reveals Russia’s Crimea takeover plot
- Obamacare cost to drop
- SCOTUS: 2 Guantanamo rulings
Angry WH / GOP Senators Clash Over Letter to Iran
• In an exceedingly rare direct congressional intervention into diplomatic negotiations, 47 Republican senators on Monday sent an open letter addressed to “leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” declaring that any nuclear agreement with President Obama could be reversed by the next president “with the stroke of a pen.” (NYT, Bloomberg, WaPo, AP, Hill, TRNS, me)
• The letter appeared aimed at unraveling an agreement even as negotiators grow close to reaching it. Obama, working with leaders of five other world powers, argue that the emerging agreement would be the best way to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb
• President Obama, noting that some in Iran also want no part of any deal, said (drily) Monday “I think it’s somewhat ironic that some members of Congress want to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran. It’s an unusual coalition.” WH spox Josh Earnest denounced the GOP efforts as a “rush to war.”
• “Writing a letter like this that appeals to the hardliners in Iran is frankly just the latest in a strategy, a partisan strategy, to undermine the president’s ability to conduct foreign policy and advance our national interests around the world,” said Earnest, citing the speech invitation issued to Israeli PM Netanyahu without consulting the WH
• Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), attributed the letter to the “pettiness” and “spite” of the Republican opposition, “Let’s be clear,” he said on the floor. “Republicans are undermining our commander in chief while empowering the ayatollahs”
• The letter came as SecState John Kerry’s office announced that he would return to Switzerland on Sunday in hopes of completing the framework agreement before an end-of-March deadline. A senior American official said the letter probably would stop an agreement from being reached, but could make it harder to blame Iran if the talks fail
• The letter (which is pretty condescending and patronizing), drafted by freshman Sen Tom Cotton (R-AR), says: “The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen, and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”
• Cotton said Monday that he drafted the letter because Iran’s leaders might not understand the American constitutional system (see Iran’s reax below). Unlike a treaty, which would require ratification by two thirds of the Senate, the agreement Obama and world powers are negotiating wouldn’t automatically go to Congress. But members of both parties are seeking a vote
• Among the Republicans who declined to sign was Sen Bob Corker (TN), Foreign Relations Committee chair, who has been working with Democrats on Iran legislation. “We’ve got a bipartisan effort that’s underway that has a chance of being successful, and while I understand all kinds of people want to weigh in,” it wouldn’t “be helpful in that effort for me to be involved”
• Because it’s not a treaty, an agreement with Iran wouldn’t require immediate congressional action. Obama has the power under current law to lift sanctions against Iran that were imposed under his executive authority and to suspend others imposed by Congress. But to permanently lift those imposed by Congress would eventually require a vote
• Republicans and several Democrats have drafted legislation aimed at forcing Obama to submit the deal to Congress for a vote. But when Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) abruptly moved to advance that bill for a vote, several Democrats who support it balked at taking action before the talks wrapped up. McConnell backed off
• Sen Tom Cotton is scheduled to appear at an off the record event today with the National Defense Industrial Assn, a lobbying group for defense contractors. On Iran, Cotton has said Congress should consider supplying Israel with B-52s and bunker-buster bombs manufactured by NDIA member Boeing to be used for a possible strike against Iran (Intercept)
Iran’s Scornful Reax
• The GOP letter starts with the premise “you may not fully understand our constitutional system.” Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister, spent nearly 10 years as the Iranian envoy to the UN and was partly educated in the U.S. Iran currently has the highest number of U.S. college alums serving in any foreign govt cabinet in the world (NYT, WaPo, me)
• “In our view, this letter has no legal value and is mostly a propaganda ploy,” Zarif responded. “It is very interesting that while negotiations are still in progress and while no agreement has been reached, some political pressure groups are so afraid even of the prospect of an agreement that they resort to unconventional methods, unprecedented in diplomatic history.”
• “I wish to enlighten the authors that if the next administration revokes any agreement with ‘the stroke of a pen,’ as they boast, it will have simply committed a blatant violation of international law,” Zarif continued in the statement
• “I should bring one important point to the attention of the authors and that is, the world is not the U.S., and the conduct of inter-state relations is governed by international law, and not by U.S. domestic law. The authors may not fully understand that in international law, govts represent the entirety of their respective states, are responsible for the conduct of foreign affairs – – –
• – – – are required to fulfill the obligations they undertake with other states and may not invoke their internal law as justification for failure to perform their international obligations.”
• A bipartisan trio of senators, including Rand Paul (R-KY), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Cory Booker (D-NJ), has planned a rollout today for legislation to remove federal legal barriers to the use of medical marijuana (Roll Call, me)
Poll: Early Takeaways for 2016
• In a new WSJ/NBC News poll out late Monday, 42% of GOP voters said they couldn’t vote for Jeb Bush, compared with 49% who said they could. In addition, 60% of all those polled said he represents “too much of a return to the policies of the past,” including 42% of GOP primary voters (WSJ, me)
• Some 86% of Democratic primary voters said they could support Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, with just 13% saying they couldn’t. She’s not weighed down as much as a legacy candidate because Democrats aren’t as turned off by that as Republicans are. But 38% of Democratic primary voters want to see someone challenge her
• More GOP voters said they were open to supporting Sen Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Gov Scott Walker (R-WI) than any of the 14 Republicans WSJ asked about – 56% for Rubio and 53% for Walker. They also face less resistance than most of their likely rivals. Gov Chris Christie (R-NJ) looks unacceptable to 57% of GOP voters (ouch)
• With SCOTUS set to hear a challenge of state laws banning same-sex marriage, the WSJ poll found 59% of the country wants to allow these couples to marry, an all-time high and a sharp increase from 2009 when just 41% backed same-sex marriage
• Americans are more likely to say the economy is improving than they were a year ago and some 47% credit President Obama. That’s good news for Democrats heading into a presidential election that will be defined, in some measure, by his legacy
• According to the highly regarded General Social Survey, the number of Americans who live in a household with at least one gun is lower than it’s ever been, paralleled by a reduction in the number of Americans who hunt. Now, 32% of Americans either own a firearm or live with someone who does. Significant decline since early 80s – then about half of Americans (AP, me)
Clinton Likely to Speak on Emails This Week
• Hillary Clinton is preparing in coming days to address her use of a private email account while serving as SecState, according to people close to Clinton, even as she continued to avoid questions about the matter on Monday after speaking at a Clinton Foundation event in New York (NYT, Politico, TRNS, me)
• One of the options Clinton is considering is a news conference, something she hasn’t held in more than two years. (this could go rather wrong for her) A spox for Clinton didn’t respond to requests for comment. She’s expected to announce her campaign for president, possibly as soon as April
• At the WH, spox Josh Earnest told reporters that President Obama traded emails with Clinton while she was SecState, but “he was not aware of the details of how that email address and that server had been set up or how Sec Clinton and her team were planning to comply with the federal records act.”
• The statement came two days after Obama told CBS News that the first time he learned that Clinton used an email address outside the U.S. govt for official business while she was in office was “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”
• Obama’s comment stirred skepticism since some interpreted it as meaning that the two had never exchanged emails while working together for four years. Earnest said Monday that Obama was “aware of her email address” but that he wasn’t aware that she used it for all of her official business or that it was a private server unconnected to the govt
• Sen Harry Reid (D-NV), Democratic leader, was interviewed last year by the FBI as part of its continuing investigation into Sen Robert Menendez (D-NJ), who federal officials say is likely to face corruption charges for accepting expensive gifts and trips from a Florida eye doctor. HHS Sec Kathleen Sebelius was also questioned (NYT)
Immigration: TX Judge Leaves Block in Place
• U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Brownsville, a city along the border with Mexico, on Monday declined to lift a block of the WH’s immigration plan until a court hearing on 19 March, where govt lawyers will have to explain a filing that some 100,000 people had been given three-year periods of deferred action prior to the judge’s injunction (Reuters, me)
• Hanen, who has previously criticized U.S. immigration enforcement as too lax, based his 17 Feb ruling on an administrative law question, faulting President Obama’s admin for not giving public notice of his plans. He also cited ways that Texas would be harmed by the action but used no other states as examples
• The decision was an initial victory for 26 states that brought the case alleging Obama had exceeded his powers with executive orders that would let up to 4.7 million illegal immigrants stay without threat of deportation. Obama’s orders bypassed Congress, which hasn’t been able to agree on immigration reform
• On 23 Feb, the DoJ requested an emergency stay of Hanen’s decision, and further asked that he at the very least limit his decision to Texas
• The DoJ said in court filings that it would take its request to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans if Hanen didn’t act by Monday. The dept couldn’t be immediately reached for comment
• In a statement Monday,President Obama said an “anti-worker law in Wisconsin will weaken, rather than strengthen workers in the new economy. Even as its governor
|
|
The Talk Radio News Service is the only information, news booking and host service dedicated to serving the talk radio community. TRNS maintains a Washington office that includes White House, Capitol Hill and Pentagon staffed bureaus, and a New York office with a United Nations staffed bureau. Talk Radio News Service has permanent access to every breaking newsevent in the Washington, D.C. area and beyond.
|
|
|
|