In the News
- Iran: Late snags with a deal
- Kerry slams GOP Iran letter
- Israeli election: Public is fed up
- Man arrested in Ferguson shootings
- Budget: GOP fights with itself
- Clintonghazi? Will House go to court?
- Bump: Debt limit hits today
- McConnell delays Lynch AG vote
- Obama kills at Gridiron dinner
Iran: Late Snags With a Deal
• SecState John Kerry, in Switzerland this week for a critical round of talks, is still clashing with Iranian FM Javad Zarif over Tehran’s demand that all UN sanctions be suspended as soon as there’s a deal, as well as Washington’s insistence that international inspectors be able to promptly visit any nuclear site, even those on Iranian military bases (NYT, AP, me)
• There are also disagreements over Iran’s research and development of advanced centrifuges, which would allow Iran to produce nuclear fuel far more quickly, as well as over how many years an agreement would last. Could they reach a lesser agreement that they’ve made enough progress to justify further talks? Possible
• Areas of convergence circulating include a complex deal in which Iran would ship large portions of its stockpiles of uranium out of the country, almost certainly to Russia. In return, the U.S. and partners could allow Iran to keep roughly 6,500 of its centrifuges spinning, rather than the few hundred under discussion a year ago
• The number of centrifuges, which could change, is important. Opponents of the deal argue that it will leave the Iranians with a latent production capacity, even though the country would have limited amounts of uranium to work with
• American officials insist that for at least the first 10 years of a final deal, the mix of fuel and enrichment capacity will leave the U.S., Israel and others with at least a year’s worth of warning time if Iran raced to make a bomb – compared to just a few months of warning time today
• “I’m embarrassed for them,” President Obama said of the 47 GOP senators in an interview with Vice News to be released today. “For them to address a letter to the ayatollah, who they claim is our mortal enemy, and their basic argument is, ‘Don’t deal with out president because you can’t trust him enough to follow through on an agreement,’ that’s unprecedented.” (Vice, TRNS)
• Inside the negotiating rooms, there’s a standoff over how to phase in the lifting of UN, American and European sanctions as Iran complies with the terms. That underscores a little-discussed but politically volatile issue for the Obama admin: how quickly Iran would see economic and tech benefits from any accord
• A suspension, and ultimate elimination, of the sanctions on oil exports and financial transactions is the key issue for President Hassan Rouhani and Zarif if they hope to sell a 10-year or longer limitation on their nuclear activity to Iranian mullahs and military leaders who have opposed the negotiations
• Leaked details of the talks are being used by opponents in Tehran, especially the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which oversees the military side of the nuclear program. They argue that by limiting Iran’s capabilities for so long, the U.S. would use an accord to thwart Iran’s emergence as the major power in the Middle East
• But any rapid lifting of sanctions – by vote of the Security Council and by President Obama – could intensify the already fierce congressional debate. Congress would ultimately need to vote to remove American sanctions, and some Republicans may balk at doing that and instead try to toughen the terms – so much so that Iran might not accept them
• Kerry has called in Energy Sec Ernest Moniz, a nuclear scientist, to bolster the argument that an accord would guarantee that, for a decade or more, the U.S. and its allies have at least a year’s warning before Iran could manufacture a bomb’s worth of weapons-grade nuclear fuel
• Israeli PM Netanyahu attempted to cancel a January briefing of U.S. senators by Israeli intel agency Mossad. The meeting eventually went ahead. Mossad told U.S. officials that a recently-floated Iran sanctions bill from Sens Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) would scuttle U.S. nuclear negotiations (Time, Bloomberg, Hill)
Kerry Slams GOP Iran Letter
• SecState John Kerry said on CBS Sunday that the GOP Iran letter “specifically inserts itself directly to the leader of another country, saying. ‘Don’t negotiate with these guys because we’re going to change this.’ which, by the way, is not only contrary to the Constitution with respect to the executive’s right to negotiate, but it is incorrect because they cannot change an executive agreement.”
• Prince Turki al-Faisal, a senior member of the Saudi royal family and the country’s former intel chief, said to the BBC, “I’ve always said whatever comes out of these talks we will want the same. So if Iran has the ability to enrich uranium to whatever level, it’s not just Saudi Arabia that’s going to ask for that.” (Hill, Politico, BBC, me)
• Cotton said Sunday on CBS that he has “no regrets” about the letter. “The alternative to a bad deal is a better deal,” he echoed Israeli PM Netanyahu. “Moreover,” Cotton said, “We have to stand up to Iran’s attempts to drive for regional dominance. They already control Tehran and, increasingly, they control Damascus and Beirut and Baghdad.” (Tehran, ya think?)
• Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said on CNN, “I don’t think it
|
|
The Talk Radio News Service is the only information, news booking and host service dedicated to serving the talk radio community. TRNS maintains a Washington office that includes White House, Capitol Hill and Pentagon staffed bureaus, and a New York office with a United Nations staffed bureau. Talk Radio News Service has permanent access to every breaking newsevent in the Washington, D.C. area and beyond.
|
|
|
|