News Now
- Iran deal: DC pols to fight it out
- Iran deal: Highlights
- Republicans: Hell no
- Democrats: Skeptical
- Netanyahu: “Historic mistake”
- Video accuses Planned Parenthood of crime
- IMF attacks Greece bailout deal
- Obama: Overhaul criminal justice system
- Court rules against nuns: Contraception
- Jade Helm 15 today: Govt takes over Texas…
• The WH launched a robust lobbying campaign Tuesday to persuade skeptical Democrats to approve the Iranian nuclear deal (details below). VP Joe Biden started calling Democratic colleagues on the Hill and heads to the House today to brief Democrats. President Obama holds a WH news conference at 1 pm EDT today
• President Obama and members of his national security team are also calling members of Congress to brief them on the agreement. The foreign policy committees in both chambers – and possibly other panels – are expected to begin holding hearings next week (fireworks). Unlikely that Congress will take any formal action before the August recess
• Republican leaders vowed to kill the accord with Iran, setting up a fierce fight. Congress will have 60 days to review it, once all docs have been sent to the Capitol, after which it can pass a resolution of approval, pass one of disapproval or do nothing
• Obama would veto a resolution of disapproval and opponents could derail the agreement only if they could rally the required two-thirds vote of Congress to override his action (will be tough)
• Obama said to NYT, “We are not measuring this deal by whether it is changing the regime inside of Iran. We’re not measuring this deal by whether we are solving every problem that can be traced back to Iran, whether we are eliminating all their nefarious activities around the globe.” – – –
&&&
• “We are measuring this deal – and that was the original premise of this conversation, including by PM Netanyahu – Iran could not get a nuclear weapon. That was always the discussion.” (a point that’s lost in the discussion – now opponents are talking terror, regime change, other things. it was never about that – as desirable as that is. still unclear if it will stop a bomb)
• Obama said he anticipated that Netanyahu would lobby Congress to reject the deal. Obama added that at some point he was prepared to discuss additional security aid that the U.S. could offer Israel to allay its concerns (won’t allay anything)
• But critics were also preparing a large-scale mobilization during the August congressional recess, when lawmakers are in their home districts and states, to stoke opposition to the agreement and agitate for Congress to block it (some fun town halls coming up)
• WH officials were bracing for difficult questions about the implications of the agreement, including what happens after the strictest limitations phase out after 10 years and how to address what Iran may do with the money – at least $100 billion in sanctions relief – to which they’ll gain access through complying with the deal
• WH officials now must decide whether Obama should try to win over a majority of Congress, including hostile Republicans, or focus on shoring up a Democratic base to sustain a veto – (he knows he can’t bring the GOP into his camp)
• Obama: “Russia was a help on this. I’ll be honest with you. I was not sure given the strong differences we are having with Russia right now around Ukraine, whether this would sustain itself. Putin and the Russian govt compartmentalized on this in a way that surprised me, and we would have not achieved this agreement had it not been for Russia’s willingness to stick with us.” (NYT interview)
Iran Deal: Highlights (AP, me)
• Enrichment: Iran will reduce the number of uranium-enriching centrifuges it has from almost 20,000 to 6,104, and reduce the number of those in use from some 10,000 to about half that. Limits in place for 10 years, then gradually relaxed over the next three. Iran commits to using only its current model – not more advanced centrifuges it had wanted to install
• Stockpile: Iran has already rid itself of stockpiled uranium that was stockpiled to one step from weapons-grade material. It’s now committed to reducing its remaining stockpile from 5 tons down to 300 kilos for 15 years. U.S. officials say at this level it would take Iran at least a year to enrich enough uranium for a nuclear weapon
• Underground site: Iran committed to convert its Fordo enrichment site – dug deep into a mountainside and thought impervious to air attack – into a research center. Will still house centrifuges but they’ll make medical isotopes instead of enriching uranium, and will be less than a tenth as many as there were
Graphic: Iran nuclear deal – a simple guide – includes easy and fun to understand diagrams – in color (NYT)
• Transparency: Iran will give more access to its nuclear program to the UN nuclear agency. If that agency identifies a suspicious site, an arbitration panel with a Western majority will decide whether Iran has to give access within 24 days. All sites, including military ones, may be inspected if the agency has solid evidence (24 days? can clean up a lot of mess in 24 days…)
• Reactors and Reprocessing: Iran must redesign its nearly built reactor at Arak so it can’t produce plutonium for nuclear weapons
• Sanctions: All U.S. and EU nuclear-related sanctions will be suspended after experts have verified that Iran is hewing to its commitments. If Iran slips, those sanctions are supposed to snap back into place. Arms embargo stands for five years and restrictions on Iran’s ballistic missile program for eight (and then…)
• House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) warned in a statement: “Instead of stopping the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, this deal is likely to fuel a nuclear arms race around the world.” Boehner vowed that the House would review every detail and vowed to “fight a bad deal that is wrong for our national security and wrong for our country.”
• Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) said Senate hearings on the deal will focus on whether the accord will allow “anytime, anywhere” inspections of Iran’s military sites and research facilities (won’t) and whether Iran must disclose the military dimensions of its nuclear program. Also sanctions relief
• Sen Bob Corker (R-Tenn), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said, “In the end, those who believe this truly is going to keep Iran from getting a nuclear weapon will vote for it. Those who believe that is not the case, and the world is not going to be safer – in some ways it may pave the way for them to get a nuclear weapon – will vote against it.”
• Former Gov Jeb Bush (R-Fla) called the deal “dangerous, deeply flawed and short sighted.” He said any deal should have required Iran to “verifiably abandon” their nuclear ambitions entirely. “This isn’t diplomacy – it’s appeasement,” Bush said – 2016er
• Sen Rand Paul (R-Ky), who in April slammed slammed others in his party whom he said had been “beating the drums for war,” said he’s against the deal. “1) sanctions relief precedes evidence of compliance, 2) Iran is left with significant nuclear capacity, 3) it lifts the ban on selling advanced weapons to Iran,” Paul wrote on Facebook
• Obama to NYT: “You know, I have a lot of disagreements with Ronald Reagan, but where I completely admire him was his recognition that if you were able to verify an agreement that
|
|
The Talk Radio News Service is the only information, news booking and host service dedicated to serving the talk radio community. TRNS maintains a Washington office that includes White House, Capitol Hill and Pentagon staffed bureaus, and a New York office with a United Nations staffed bureau. Talk Radio News Service has permanent access to every breaking newsevent in the Washington, D.C. area and beyond.
|
|
|
|